Bbs:TechnischOntwerp1.0.0-alpha: verschil tussen versies

Uit informatiestandaarden
Ga naar: navigatie, zoeken
(Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met '{{Vdraft/InformationBox|This IG is currently under development and can not be considered stable and ready for use. For questions and change requests regarding this...')
 
 
Regel 81: Regel 81:
 
----
 
----
  
== 4. Ret
+
== 4. Retrieval of Imaging Objects ==
 +
 
 +
=== Retrieval Principle ===
 +
 
 +
Retrieval is a gateway-exposed capability.
 +
 
 +
A gateway SHALL:
 +
 
 +
* Expose imaging objects for cross-community retrieval 
 +
* Support web-based access to DICOM objects 
 +
* Enforce applicable security and access control policies 
 +
 
 +
=== Legacy Mechanisms ===
 +
 
 +
* Legacy retrieval mechanisms are acknowledged 
 +
* They are discouraged for new implementations 
 +
 
 +
This chapter defines what a gateway exposes — not how imaging data is internally stored.
 +
 
 +
----
 +
 
 +
== 5. Publication and Metadata Management (Contextual) ==
 +
 
 +
This chapter ensures architectural completeness without prescribing internal solutions.
 +
 
 +
=== Metadata Requirement ===
 +
 
 +
Within each community:
 +
 
 +
* Metadata describing imaging objects MUST exist 
 +
* A publication mechanism MUST be present 
 +
 
 +
The TD does not mandate how metadata is created, stored, or indexed.
 +
 
 +
=== Non-Normative Examples ===
 +
 
 +
Examples of commonly used approaches include:
 +
 
 +
* XDS-I.b 
 +
* MHD 
 +
* Other equivalent mechanisms 
 +
 
 +
These examples are illustrative and non-prescriptive.
 +
 
 +
----
 +
 
 +
== 6. Manifest-Based Exchange ==
 +
 
 +
=== Principle ===
 +
 
 +
The unit of exchange is a manifest.
 +
 
 +
=== Mechanism ===
 +
 
 +
* Use of DICOM Key Object Selection (KOS) 
 +
* The manifest references imaging objects 
 +
* Referenced objects are retrieved via gateway interfaces 
 +
 
 +
=== Benefits ===
 +
 
 +
* Scalable 
 +
* Future-proof 
 +
* Content-agnostic 
 +
* Decouples metadata exchange from object retrieval 
 +
 
 +
----
 +
 
 +
== 7. Alignment with European Interoperability Initiatives ==
 +
 
 +
This section describes alignment at the semantic and conceptual level.
 +
 
 +
=== Xt-EHR Alignment ===
 +
 
 +
* Alignment on semantics 
 +
* Alignment on metadata concepts 
 +
* Alignment on imaging report structures 
 +
 
 +
=== Explicit Non-Scope ===
 +
 
 +
This TD does not prescribe:
 +
 
 +
* Transport mechanisms beyond gateway interoperability 
 +
* Workflow orchestration 
 +
* National implementation constraints beyond architecture 
 +
 
 +
----
 +
 
 +
== 8. Use Cases ==
 +
 
 +
Use cases are mapped to architectural patterns rather than specific technical profiles.
 +
 
 +
=== Registry-Based Community ===
 +
 
 +
* Community maintains internal registry mechanisms 
 +
* Gateway exposes cross-community query capabilities 
 +
 
 +
=== Federated Cross-Community Exchange ===
 +
 
 +
* Multiple communities connected via gateway federation 
 +
* Queries are routed across community boundaries 
 +
 
 +
=== Manifest-Based Retrieval ===
 +
 
 +
* Exchange based on manifest objects 
 +
* Imaging objects retrieved via gateway-exposed services 
 +
 
 +
----
 +
 
 +
== Version Information ==
 +
 
 +
* Version: 1.0.0-alpha 
 +
* Status: Draft Technical Design 
 +
* Intended publication: End of Q1

Huidige versie van 16 feb 2026 om 04:10

Icoon Nictiz Cirkel Informatie Oranje.svg

This IG is currently under development and can not be considered stable and ready for use. For questions and change requests regarding this IG, please create a ticket op the Servicedesk.



BBS

1 Technical Design – Beeldbeschikbaarheid 1.0.0-alpha

1.1 1. Scope and Purpose

1.1.1 Purpose

This Technical Design (TD) describes the architectural approach for cross-community exchange of medical imaging information.

The design focuses explicitly on:

  • Cross-community imaging exchange
  • Gateway-to-gateway interoperability
  • Federated exchange between healthcare communities

1.1.2 Out of Scope

The following aspects are explicitly out of scope:

  • Internal systems and workflows within healthcare organizations
  • Internal storage mechanisms
  • Local technical implementations
  • Vendor-specific architectural choices

This TD defines how communities interoperate — not how they implement internally.


1.2 2. Architectural Principles

This section describes the guiding architectural principles.

1.2.1 Community Boundaries

  • Each community is autonomous
  • Internal implementation freedom is preserved
  • Communities are responsible for their own data governance

1.2.2 Gateways

  • Gateways function as trust anchors
  • Gateways act as the interoperability boundary
  • All cross-community interaction occurs via gateways

1.2.3 Separation of Concerns

  • Internal architecture is separated from external interoperability
  • The TD does not prescribe internal registry or storage mechanisms
  • Only externally exposed capabilities are specified

1.3 3. Cross-Community Federation

This section describes the federated architecture model.

1.3.1 Cross-Community Query

  • Queries are performed via community gateways
  • Cross-community querying is based on XCA principles
  • Gateways are responsible for forwarding and responding to queries

1.3.2 Imaging Context

  • XCA-I applies in imaging-specific contexts
  • No SOAP transaction-level details are specified in this document
  • No RAD-75 transaction descriptions are included

This TD defines architectural positioning, not transaction specifications.


1.4 4. Retrieval of Imaging Objects

1.4.1 Retrieval Principle

Retrieval is a gateway-exposed capability.

A gateway SHALL:

  • Expose imaging objects for cross-community retrieval
  • Support web-based access to DICOM objects
  • Enforce applicable security and access control policies

1.4.2 Legacy Mechanisms

  • Legacy retrieval mechanisms are acknowledged
  • They are discouraged for new implementations

This chapter defines what a gateway exposes — not how imaging data is internally stored.


1.5 5. Publication and Metadata Management (Contextual)

This chapter ensures architectural completeness without prescribing internal solutions.

1.5.1 Metadata Requirement

Within each community:

  • Metadata describing imaging objects MUST exist
  • A publication mechanism MUST be present

The TD does not mandate how metadata is created, stored, or indexed.

1.5.2 Non-Normative Examples

Examples of commonly used approaches include:

  • XDS-I.b
  • MHD
  • Other equivalent mechanisms

These examples are illustrative and non-prescriptive.


1.6 6. Manifest-Based Exchange

1.6.1 Principle

The unit of exchange is a manifest.

1.6.2 Mechanism

  • Use of DICOM Key Object Selection (KOS)
  • The manifest references imaging objects
  • Referenced objects are retrieved via gateway interfaces

1.6.3 Benefits

  • Scalable
  • Future-proof
  • Content-agnostic
  • Decouples metadata exchange from object retrieval

1.7 7. Alignment with European Interoperability Initiatives

This section describes alignment at the semantic and conceptual level.

1.7.1 Xt-EHR Alignment

  • Alignment on semantics
  • Alignment on metadata concepts
  • Alignment on imaging report structures

1.7.2 Explicit Non-Scope

This TD does not prescribe:

  • Transport mechanisms beyond gateway interoperability
  • Workflow orchestration
  • National implementation constraints beyond architecture

1.8 8. Use Cases

Use cases are mapped to architectural patterns rather than specific technical profiles.

1.8.1 Registry-Based Community

  • Community maintains internal registry mechanisms
  • Gateway exposes cross-community query capabilities

1.8.2 Federated Cross-Community Exchange

  • Multiple communities connected via gateway federation
  • Queries are routed across community boundaries

1.8.3 Manifest-Based Retrieval

  • Exchange based on manifest objects
  • Imaging objects retrieved via gateway-exposed services

1.9 Version Information

  • Version: 1.0.0-alpha
  • Status: Draft Technical Design
  • Intended publication: End of Q1