Bbs:TechnischOntwerp1.0.0-alpha: verschil tussen versies
(Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met '{{Vdraft/InformationBox|This IG is currently under development and can not be considered stable and ready for use. For questions and change requests regarding this...') |
|||
| Regel 81: | Regel 81: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | == 4. | + | == 4. Retrieval of Imaging Objects == |
| + | |||
| + | === Retrieval Principle === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Retrieval is a gateway-exposed capability. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A gateway SHALL: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Expose imaging objects for cross-community retrieval | ||
| + | * Support web-based access to DICOM objects | ||
| + | * Enforce applicable security and access control policies | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Legacy Mechanisms === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Legacy retrieval mechanisms are acknowledged | ||
| + | * They are discouraged for new implementations | ||
| + | |||
| + | This chapter defines what a gateway exposes — not how imaging data is internally stored. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | == 5. Publication and Metadata Management (Contextual) == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This chapter ensures architectural completeness without prescribing internal solutions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Metadata Requirement === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Within each community: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Metadata describing imaging objects MUST exist | ||
| + | * A publication mechanism MUST be present | ||
| + | |||
| + | The TD does not mandate how metadata is created, stored, or indexed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Non-Normative Examples === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Examples of commonly used approaches include: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * XDS-I.b | ||
| + | * MHD | ||
| + | * Other equivalent mechanisms | ||
| + | |||
| + | These examples are illustrative and non-prescriptive. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | == 6. Manifest-Based Exchange == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Principle === | ||
| + | |||
| + | The unit of exchange is a manifest. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Mechanism === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Use of DICOM Key Object Selection (KOS) | ||
| + | * The manifest references imaging objects | ||
| + | * Referenced objects are retrieved via gateway interfaces | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Benefits === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Scalable | ||
| + | * Future-proof | ||
| + | * Content-agnostic | ||
| + | * Decouples metadata exchange from object retrieval | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | == 7. Alignment with European Interoperability Initiatives == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This section describes alignment at the semantic and conceptual level. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Xt-EHR Alignment === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Alignment on semantics | ||
| + | * Alignment on metadata concepts | ||
| + | * Alignment on imaging report structures | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Explicit Non-Scope === | ||
| + | |||
| + | This TD does not prescribe: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Transport mechanisms beyond gateway interoperability | ||
| + | * Workflow orchestration | ||
| + | * National implementation constraints beyond architecture | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | == 8. Use Cases == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Use cases are mapped to architectural patterns rather than specific technical profiles. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Registry-Based Community === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Community maintains internal registry mechanisms | ||
| + | * Gateway exposes cross-community query capabilities | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Federated Cross-Community Exchange === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Multiple communities connected via gateway federation | ||
| + | * Queries are routed across community boundaries | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Manifest-Based Retrieval === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Exchange based on manifest objects | ||
| + | * Imaging objects retrieved via gateway-exposed services | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Version Information == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Version: 1.0.0-alpha | ||
| + | * Status: Draft Technical Design | ||
| + | * Intended publication: End of Q1 | ||
Huidige versie van 16 feb 2026 om 04:10
|
|
This IG is currently under development and can not be considered stable and ready for use. For questions and change requests regarding this IG, please create a ticket op the Servicedesk. |
|
|
This article or section is in the middle of an expansion or major restructuring and is not yet ready for use. |
Inhoud
- 1 Technical Design – Beeldbeschikbaarheid 1.0.0-alpha
- 1.1 1. Scope and Purpose
- 1.2 2. Architectural Principles
- 1.3 3. Cross-Community Federation
- 1.4 4. Retrieval of Imaging Objects
- 1.5 5. Publication and Metadata Management (Contextual)
- 1.6 6. Manifest-Based Exchange
- 1.7 7. Alignment with European Interoperability Initiatives
- 1.8 8. Use Cases
- 1.9 Version Information
1 Technical Design – Beeldbeschikbaarheid 1.0.0-alpha
1.1 1. Scope and Purpose
1.1.1 Purpose
This Technical Design (TD) describes the architectural approach for cross-community exchange of medical imaging information.
The design focuses explicitly on:
- Cross-community imaging exchange
- Gateway-to-gateway interoperability
- Federated exchange between healthcare communities
1.1.2 Out of Scope
The following aspects are explicitly out of scope:
- Internal systems and workflows within healthcare organizations
- Internal storage mechanisms
- Local technical implementations
- Vendor-specific architectural choices
This TD defines how communities interoperate — not how they implement internally.
1.2 2. Architectural Principles
This section describes the guiding architectural principles.
1.2.1 Community Boundaries
- Each community is autonomous
- Internal implementation freedom is preserved
- Communities are responsible for their own data governance
1.2.2 Gateways
- Gateways function as trust anchors
- Gateways act as the interoperability boundary
- All cross-community interaction occurs via gateways
1.2.3 Separation of Concerns
- Internal architecture is separated from external interoperability
- The TD does not prescribe internal registry or storage mechanisms
- Only externally exposed capabilities are specified
1.3 3. Cross-Community Federation
This section describes the federated architecture model.
1.3.1 Cross-Community Query
- Queries are performed via community gateways
- Cross-community querying is based on XCA principles
- Gateways are responsible for forwarding and responding to queries
1.3.2 Imaging Context
- XCA-I applies in imaging-specific contexts
- No SOAP transaction-level details are specified in this document
- No RAD-75 transaction descriptions are included
This TD defines architectural positioning, not transaction specifications.
1.4 4. Retrieval of Imaging Objects
1.4.1 Retrieval Principle
Retrieval is a gateway-exposed capability.
A gateway SHALL:
- Expose imaging objects for cross-community retrieval
- Support web-based access to DICOM objects
- Enforce applicable security and access control policies
1.4.2 Legacy Mechanisms
- Legacy retrieval mechanisms are acknowledged
- They are discouraged for new implementations
This chapter defines what a gateway exposes — not how imaging data is internally stored.
1.5 5. Publication and Metadata Management (Contextual)
This chapter ensures architectural completeness without prescribing internal solutions.
1.5.1 Metadata Requirement
Within each community:
- Metadata describing imaging objects MUST exist
- A publication mechanism MUST be present
The TD does not mandate how metadata is created, stored, or indexed.
1.5.2 Non-Normative Examples
Examples of commonly used approaches include:
- XDS-I.b
- MHD
- Other equivalent mechanisms
These examples are illustrative and non-prescriptive.
1.6 6. Manifest-Based Exchange
1.6.1 Principle
The unit of exchange is a manifest.
1.6.2 Mechanism
- Use of DICOM Key Object Selection (KOS)
- The manifest references imaging objects
- Referenced objects are retrieved via gateway interfaces
1.6.3 Benefits
- Scalable
- Future-proof
- Content-agnostic
- Decouples metadata exchange from object retrieval
1.7 7. Alignment with European Interoperability Initiatives
This section describes alignment at the semantic and conceptual level.
1.7.1 Xt-EHR Alignment
- Alignment on semantics
- Alignment on metadata concepts
- Alignment on imaging report structures
1.7.2 Explicit Non-Scope
This TD does not prescribe:
- Transport mechanisms beyond gateway interoperability
- Workflow orchestration
- National implementation constraints beyond architecture
1.8 8. Use Cases
Use cases are mapped to architectural patterns rather than specific technical profiles.
1.8.1 Registry-Based Community
- Community maintains internal registry mechanisms
- Gateway exposes cross-community query capabilities
1.8.2 Federated Cross-Community Exchange
- Multiple communities connected via gateway federation
- Queries are routed across community boundaries
1.8.3 Manifest-Based Retrieval
- Exchange based on manifest objects
- Imaging objects retrieved via gateway-exposed services
1.9 Version Information
- Version: 1.0.0-alpha
- Status: Draft Technical Design
- Intended publication: End of Q1